<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Evaluation and adaptive learning at work: Insights from RF MERL Mali	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://r4d.org/blog/evaluation-adaptive-learning-insights-rf-merl-mali/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://r4d.org/blog/evaluation-adaptive-learning-insights-rf-merl-mali/</link>
	<description>Corporate Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 12:03:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anthony Reid Harvey		</title>
		<link>https://r4d.org/blog/evaluation-adaptive-learning-insights-rf-merl-mali/#comment-18381</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony Reid Harvey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 12:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://r4d.org/?p=14091#comment-18381</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the good work!  I am a ceramic industrial designer, focused on environmental health and industrial development.  I am continuously frustrated that my sustainable developments are arguably best practice even with their affordability.  There appears to be nothing in policy that supports the SDGs 6&#038;7 stipulations of affordability.  Who would send a US$4 energy optimized cook stove to America for evaluation?  Who would send a $3 ceramic water filter to Europe for evaluation?  Ceramic educators know about the the viability of these devices, their materials, processes and application.  Other evaluators do not.  As a result these wonderful devices are not encouraged.

Please have a look at our presentation of October 4, 2022, to the EU Tech Chamber Manufacturing Alliance.  Nearly all of the SDGs are addressed squarely.  https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UDscBPG7lbqm9wpFwfEaCGdWiwaKt3qT/view?usp=share_link]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the good work!  I am a ceramic industrial designer, focused on environmental health and industrial development.  I am continuously frustrated that my sustainable developments are arguably best practice even with their affordability.  There appears to be nothing in policy that supports the SDGs 6&amp;7 stipulations of affordability.  Who would send a US$4 energy optimized cook stove to America for evaluation?  Who would send a $3 ceramic water filter to Europe for evaluation?  Ceramic educators know about the the viability of these devices, their materials, processes and application.  Other evaluators do not.  As a result these wonderful devices are not encouraged.</p>
<p>Please have a look at our presentation of October 4, 2022, to the EU Tech Chamber Manufacturing Alliance.  Nearly all of the SDGs are addressed squarely.  <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UDscBPG7lbqm9wpFwfEaCGdWiwaKt3qT/view?usp=share_link" rel="nofollow ugc">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UDscBPG7lbqm9wpFwfEaCGdWiwaKt3qT/view?usp=share_link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
